As I sat down to write this, a quick check showed that 40% of the electricity being generated in the region from northern Texas through North Dakota was wind power. The following is condensed to meet the paper’s letter policy.

Don’t think wind energy is “green?” Its carbon footprint is roughly one-40th that of natural gas and one-19th that of coal. Energy payback period for a large turbine is three to six months, with a 20-year life expectancy. After the initial lifespan, foundations can be re-powered with a new turbine, new blades, or both. Most components are recyclable.

Efforts are being made to recycle the rest, most notably, the blades. Should they end up as landfill, they are among the most inert, non-toxic items there, as opposed to spent fuel from nuclear plants or coal ash. A short list of supporters of properly-sited wind farms includes the Izaak Walton League, Natural Resources Defense Council, Nature Conservancy, Environmental Defense Fund, Audubon Society, and Sierra Club .

Bats and birds? Wind farms must be properly sited to minimize bird and bat deaths. But far larger numbers are killed by climate change and habitat loss, collisions with windows, cats, lead-poisoning from hunting residue, hunting, pesticides, and vehicles.

In light of the recent bleak outlook presented by the UN Environment Program for the future of our planet, without a concerted effort to eliminate the use of fossil fuels, we need to embrace renewable sources of electricity, sooner rather than later.

(8) comments


The carbon footprint of wind is actually about 1/90th that of coal. Sorry about any confusion.


Fossil fuels are responsible for far more bird fatalities than solar or wind.

Jolly Roger

A breath of fresh air! (Windy, electricity-generating fresh air!!) Great change of pace after the troglodytic whinings of Hubner, Van Gerpen and the Brennemans who labor so hard holding on to the past.


I like Larson’s bird statistics. I always find it funny how much empathy for birds the climate change deniers suddenly find when they argue against wind power.

Friedrich Farmer

👍👍👍Good to hear someone talking up wind for a change.


Hey, Kristi, how ‘bout “Wind- We’re On It!“

Or if you’re going to draw national ridicule, at least I can save you the cost of that out-of-state focus group. How ‘bout, “ South Dakota Breaks Wind!”


Yep I'm agreeing with the Sierra Club guy... We have an abundance of wind; we should use it!


I got a new diesel heavy duty pickup. I get about 13 mpg - a little less around town. With the cold weather I just let it idle when I'm not driving it. I love the smell of a diesel. It sounds cool too. I like to "rev" up so I can hear it better. Since it's so darn cold I wish global warming would hurry up. Maybe my new pickup will help.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.