Thanks for an accurate and great article by Randy Dockendorf — no surprise there — on South Dakota’s highway projects (Press & Dakotan, July 15).  

We are fortunate that our state is moving ahead on various projects even though there is a lack of positive action by Congress on this important issue and, thereby, no guidance on any future planning of needed projects.  

The big hang-up on any highway bill, which plagues us every five or six years when the existing one expires, is FUNDING. Even though the present proposed plan by the president and Democrats has an excessive amount of pork-barrel projects in it, unrelated to true infrastructure, the passage will get down to, “How are we going to pay for it?”

Democrats and Republicans alike need to wake up to the fact that the ONLY viable method is to increase the federal gasoline tax. This outdated amount is at 18.4 cents per gallon of gasoline and has not been increased since that amount was set in 1993!  That is almost 30 years since we’ve seen an increase in the federal tax. What other daily required items can any of us come up with which have not increased in price in 28 years?

One of the funding ideas for the proposal suggested by the president is to increase taxes on Americans making over $400,000/year.  Does anybody really feel that this would provide enough additional funding and, by the way, how fair and lopsided is that idea?  

The ONLY way to pay for a new highway bill and to prevent our Highway Trust Fund from going broke is to gradually increase this 18.4 cents number.  If you drive a vehicle powered by gasoline (or diesel, which is taxed at 24.4 cents) and buy fuel, you need to pay for the highways that you drive on; it’s simple. An elderly non-driving person or anyone who does not drive will not pay one cent more.  What could be fairer?  

How many times do we go to the gasoline pumps and note that the price per gallon has just increased by a few cents? So, the obvious, intelligent solution is to initially increase the federal tax by perhaps a nickel and then by 1 or 2 pennies per year, possibly dependent on inflation.

In a few years, this federal tax would still be less than the average state tax on gasoline, which now sits at about 30 cents/gallon; South Dakota’s is 28 cents/gallon, as it was just increased a few years ago, thanks to the diligent work of Mitchell’s Mike Vehle and others in our state.

America cannot afford our highways and bridges and airfields to deteriorate, for safety, congestion and resultant fuel consumption, defense and a number of other valid reasons. Congress needs to wake up and face this issue head on with a federal gasoline tax increase, similar to what has been done by most states.

Joe Vig of Yankton is a retired manufacturing executive who served as president of Kolberg-Pioneer, Inc., and was a group president of Kolberg-Pioneer, Inc./Johnson Crushers International (KPI-JCI) and Astec Mobile Screens.  

 

(5) comments

Jwehrer

Joe,

I agree with you with regard to fairness in taxation. What would you propose for electric vehicles? They use the roads too but don’t pay a gas tax. Interested in your thoughts on that.

wakeupmaggie

Yes this. More and more electric cars are being driven and sold.

Yankton resident

Joe hasn't seen a tax that he won't support, especially if it supports his agenda, or a republican initiates it. If however the tax is proposed by a democrat, even if it is in support of Joe's agenda, it is evil and should be condemned. My suggestion to Joe is to find a republican congressional official to support his proposed tax increase for his personal agenda. I would hope that he is then careful not to criticize any democrat who may support it.

I find it hilarious that republicans are all for reduced taxes, unless it is a personal agenda issue, then the sky is the limit for years to come on all taxpayers, to satisfy an egotistic personal agenda.

MISTER GARY

So, "Yankton Resident." Do you believe Electric Car Owners have any obligation

to help pay for roads their Electric Cars drive on? I find your comment interesting because Republicans Hate Electric Cars. Republicans really only want gas guzzling, air polluting vehicles. Republicans always are against "Clean" and "Decent." I am surprized the don't want "coal burning" Cars, Trucks, SUV's, Etc. Republicans HATE Clean anything. Today's Republicans hate the EPA...THAT President Nixion championed and promoted through Congress. Republicans hate any semblence of Cleanliness and Decency...and TRUTH.

Yankton resident

jMister Gary: I agree with what you have said 100%. I also believe what you have said adds value to my previous comments. Thanks for clarifying what I said about personal agendas and ego.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.