There is some long-needed good news in the air these days in regard to the COVID-19 pandemic. The Food and Drug Administration has given emergency approval to the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine, which began shipping late this past weekend. Meanwhile, the Moderna vaccine is scheduled to present its case for emergency approval this week, and if also gains an emergency blessing, it will begin shipping immediately, as well.

The vaccines will be administered based on priorities set out by the states. In South Dakota, health care personnel who work directly with COVID-19 and employees at long-term care facilities are first in line in what will be a process that should eventually see the vaccine available to the general public by April or May, according to officials with the Department of Health.

And that is all good news, despite the fact that we still face a long, uncertain winter before us before the vaccine is available on a broad basis.

Also, there are still hurdles to be conquered. For instance, the orderly nationwide distribution of the vaccine must be ironed out, and this must now become a top priority of federal officials.

However, another looming hurdle will likely be a general ambivalence among some people to take the vaccine. According to an Associated Press/NORC poll released last week, only about half of Americans say they would definitely get the vaccine. Another 27% said they were unsure, but more than one-fourth of the respondents (26%) said they would not get the vaccine under any circumstance. Surprisingly, more males than females said they would get the vaccine. Not so surprisingly, the number of those who are certain they would get the vaccine climbed with age.

To be fair, one can understand the reticence. The vaccine has been pushed through channels quickly — remember, we only became aware of COVID-19 less than a year ago — and no one could be blamed for wanting to see that the vaccine actually works AND doesn’t have any severe side effects. Also, the whole COVID issue has been politicized to an unfortunate degree, which has become both polarizing and dangerous.

To that end, any showing of support for vaccine from our leadership is needed. For instance, the pledges by former presidents Bill Clinton, George W. Bush and Barack Obama to take the vaccines live on television may be helpful.

On that note, we commend South Dakota Sen. Mike Rounds, who states in his latest weekly column — published on this page today (Tuesday) — that he will take the COVID-19 vaccine. He cites his wife Jean, who is battling cancer, and his concern for her health. He also notes that the vaccine, while it has been produced at a lightning pace, has nonetheless been tested rigorously; it would not be released to the public without such extensive study. Finally, Rounds also calls on South Dakotans to continue practicing safety precautions like wearing masks (“darn masks,” he wrote) and social distancing while many of us await our opportunities to take the vaccine.

There is still a long way to go in our COVID fight, but reinforcements are on the march. Hope is lighting up the skies, and perhaps normalcy is on the horizon. But we all have much to do in the meantime, from staying protected to getting injected. It’s the only way we can win this war.


(3) comments


I invite anyone who thinks the vaccine is a good idea to get "injected" as you worded it. It is their right to believe in it- and it id MY right to not get injected. Common sense would say that this vaccine has a lot of unknowns since it was developed so quickly after the start of the China Virus. Other vaccines take 5-10 years to develop and this one was like 8 months?? I will take my chance and not get vaccinated and I am basing this off of the 99.9% survival rate of COVID if I do catch Kung Flu.


There is a reason this vaccine was developed so quickly, defying projections. It is an RNA Vaccine. It does not use live/dead Corona-19 virus. There never has been a widely distributed RNA Vaccine before this one, and only very few other RNA vaccines that were not widely distributed. Do we know the long term effects of an RNA Vaccine? No, we've no history to go by.

But, i will be taking the vaccine at the first opportunity. The only other option is to wait 3-5 years (?) for a dead Corona-19 virus vaccine. I don't relish wearing a mask for that long, nor do I wish to roll the dice on catching this thing. Nor do I relish what would be effectively a shut down economy for years to come.

Man Up! Take the "jab".


MAGA, medical people say it’s all because of the scientific advances in vaccine development.

More important, you’re not being a loyal Trumpster. Donald is telling us that this “Warp Speed” early delivery of the vaccine is all because of his demanding top speed in its development.

You've probably stopped listening to those liberals at FoxNews now that they’ve begun experimenting with the truth. But you’d know this vaccine is a Trump Triumph if you’d checked out Newsmax.

To be a true Trumpster it’s not enough to ignore the facts - you have to keep up with what your leader says is the Truth. Shape up!

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.