City: No To Mask Mandate

At this time, the City of Yankton will not follow other communities in South Dakota in implementing a mask mandate in response to the growing COVID-19 pandemic.

During a work session Monday night to hash out the Yankton city government’s response to the growing numbers, the board opted to go with an education effort rather than the process of enacting a mask mandate — but it was not by unanimous decision.

During the work session, City Attorney Ross Den Herder presented the commission with a number of options, ranging from doing nothing to an existing resolution suggesting masks to passing an ordinance with an enforcement mechanism.

The commissioners largely favored option number two, which would keep the masking resolution the same with the addition of an educational  effort — one proposed by former City Commissioner Dan Specht.

“Nancy (Wenande) and I, Kasi Haberman and Ellie Highstreet have been talking the last few days with the support of some local leadership about how we can use some of the talents we have to educate the community and motivate the community through a marketing campaign effort,” Specht said. “What are some ways that we can influence the people around us to follow the CDC guidelines, keep our schools open, keep our businesses open, reduce hospitalization and infection rates? We all really know what to do; sometimes, we just need to be reminded to do that.”

He said that local entities are working on a 3- to 4-month marketing campaign meant to encourage Yankton residents to follow CDC guidelines in order to keep schools and businesses open while also working to reduce infection.

He estimated the marketing campaign around $38,000, of which $15,000 would come from the city. The city money would possibly qualify for reimbursement under the CARES Act, but City Manager Amy Leon cautioned the commission that they would have to submit the request and see what the state says.

Commissioner Amy Miner said she favored an ordinance with some sort of enforcement mechanism.

“We have to have some sort of mechanism in place,” she said. “We don’t have to lead with the hammer. … I’ve been teaching for a long time. You’re preaching to the choir with the education, but I know if I give an assignment to a student and I say, ‘You can do it or not,’ if I don’t have a consequence, I’m in a pickle.”

Commissioner Jerry Webber also spoke in favor of an ordinance.

“It seems like an ineffective way to deal with such a serious problem if we don’t have some kind of a consequence tied to it,” Webber said.

However, Leon said many communities have found enforcement difficult.

“The communities that have had these (mandates) in place in our area have not had a lot of luck with enforcement,” she said. “We’ve had the discussion that people are calling in to report the offense, but there’s not a good way to go about enforcing. In some cases, dispatches have been busy with calls.”

Yankton Chief of Police John Harris also spoke on the difficulties of enforcement.

Commissioner Mason Schramm said that a mandate — including the word itself — has too many negative connotations.

“The word ‘mandate’ has such a visceral and emotional reaction for certain people that it’s hard to look at that in a positive way,” he said. “I’d like to see a positive approach that’s not so antagonistic to a large number of our population.”

Commissioner Ben Brunick favored an approach in the middle of doing nothing and adding an enforcement ordinance.

“I am not in favor of enforcement; however, I am in favor of an ordinance,” he said. “I’m not in favor of going along with what we have been doing. … There needs to be a compromise that there is not enforcement but there is also not a green light to say, ‘Nothing is being done wrong by not wearing a mask.’”

Commissioners Brunick, Webber, Miner and Mayor Nathan Johnson were the only commisisoners to speak favorably for an ordinance of some kind.

With no changes sought on the existing resolution and little appetite to move forward on an ordinance, a discussion item on masking options was scrapped from the commission’s regular meeting agenda following the work session.

However, the public comment period saw several people — in person and on YouTube — comment against the idea of passing a mask mandate. A YouTube commenter even went as far as calling the commissioners communists for considering a mask mandate.

In other business Monday, the commission approved several plats and replats.

Follow @RobNielsenPandD on Twitter.

(4) comments


People need to be told what to do. We’ve had so much “education” which has done no good! It’s no different than “no shirts, no shoes, no service”. This is life or death for many people! Step up City Commissioners!



Yankton resident

Just shows who runs the city commission! YAPG, the Chamber, a paid consultant of the Chamber and their minions. And to think the chamber wants to use city tax payer money to pay for a consultant and to pay for public awareness that everyone is already aware of.

The city commission is elected to represent the citizens of the community and act in the best interests of those citizens. They have once again chosen to represent a paid out of town consultant, YAPG, and the Chamber.

It is clear that an extra dollar for the previous mentioned is of more importance than the well being of the community as a whole. Informational attack of the pandemic is not working and we all know it. It is time for the commission to heed and take the advice of the CDC and medical experts rather than that of the greedy and uninformed. Make the mask mandate and other CDC recommendations to slow the COVID pandemic and tie a petty offense to any violation ($25). Don't tell me it can't be enforced, because it can (i.e.) the smoking ban in public places is a state law and it has been enforced. Once a few fines are paid the word will get out and there will be compliance, and a reduction of COVID.

The individual that to enact a mandate on masks is communism, that is bull. To purposely allow this pandemic and uncontrolled virus to run rampant sickening, weakening, and killing our citizens is not acceptable and is in fact communism and/or fascism. The purpose of a democratic government is to be responsible and protect and serve all citizens, to just a select few.

It is time for the city commission to step forward and do what they elected to do, protect and serve. If they are not up to the task they should step aside and let responsible citizens do the job they are not capable of.


You should email this to all the city commissioners and/or send this in as a letter to the editor.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.